Breast augmentation-above or below the muscle ?

There are ongoing debates as to whether it is more advisable to place the implants in breast augmentation on top or below the breast muscle.

As in most cases involving aesthetic surgery, there is no single right answer.
The main reason for subpectoral (under the muscle) placement is as follows:
1. The muscle covers the implant, thus capsular contracture (“breasts that feel hard”) is less common.It has become rare anyway, but the cases that I usually see are breast augmentation on top of the muscle. Another theory is that should capsular contracture occur it may be less obvious to be detected.
2. For the same reason, rippling (wrinkling) of the implant is less apparent.It is never completely evitable though.If patients will normally notice such rippling on the lower pole and side.
3. Mammograms are more accurate.
4. In very small-breasted women, the outline of the implant is less visible.As a rule of thumb, if the thickness of breast tissue is less than 2 inches, submuscular placeement is mandatory.
5. Muscle tissue is well perfused. Perfusion is the best combat tool against infection, the most dreaded risk in breast augmentation .

The argument for subglandular breast augmentation (under the breast tissue) placement is as follows:

1. If any degree of ptosis is present, a subglandular implant lifts the breasts much better.
2. Lower risk of postoperative bleeding is involved.
3. Significantly less postoperative pain occurs.
4.  Breast augmentationcan be performed with intravenous sedation and local anesthesia, which is a safer alternative to general (complete) anesthesia.

Examples from our gallery:

Breast augmentation 335cc anatomical implants submuscular before:

Breast augmentation 335cc submuscular anatomical implants after surgery:

Breast augmentation 340 cc moderate profile round implants subglandular before:

Breast augmentation 340 cc moderate profile round implants subglandular after:

There are no precut recipes for the best procedure in breast augmentation, but a lot of suitable solutions for different patients.

For more info please visit www.cirumed.es

Dr.Alexander Amir  Aslani, MD, EBOPRAS

Hospital:

Director and Chief Surgeon
Department of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery
Hospital Quiron Malaga
Avda.Imperio Argentina, 1
E-29004 Malaga
Spain
www.quiron.es
www.cirumed.es

Is breast augmentation combined with uplift a safe procedure ?

Breast augmentation mastopexy,which means a breast uplift combined with  breast augmentation with implants is probably, apart perhaps from rhinoplasty, the most demanding procedure in aesthetic surgery.

“There is a lot of misunderstanding around this operation,and whilst it may be extremely rewarding, patients need to understand the complexity of the operation to adequately appreciate the results “, says Dr. Alexander Aslani, who is head of department of Plastic surgery, Hospital Quiron, Malaga.
He has extensive experience with breast augmentation with mastopexy, because it is one the most frequently demanded operations within cosmetic surgery in Spain.

Indication for a breast uplift is breast ptosis (sagginess) of the breast, most commonly following weight loss and pregnancy.

This results in an empty skin envelope with no appropriate filling. The concept of the operation is to tackle the problem from two sides: firstly to tighten the skin envelope and secondly to fill it appropriately with a breast implant.
“The change can be very impressive and patient satisfaction is very high, however, depending on the degree of sagginess, a certain amount of scarring will be necessary,” says Dr.Aslani.”I normally advise patients that shape of the breast is much more important to patients than scarring in the long run, but scarring will be involved.
To what degree does very much depend on your skin type, the fairer the skin the better the result.”
There are still surgeons promoting a two-stage approach, which means doing the mastopexy in one go and then the implant placement in the next.
“The advantage of this is that the tissue reaction is more predictable” so Dr. Aslani.”On the other hand patients always need two operations. In my experience, although I completely agree that the overall revision and complication rate of combined breast implants and uplift is significantly higher than in a plain breast augmentation , it is safe and preferable to do the operation in one go.
There is a higher incidence of infection, wound healing problems, scar revision, that is true, but this is clearly outweighed by the benefit arising to the patient from a one-stage procedure.

My experience is that given that patients are aware of the complexity of such a breast augmentation and breast uplift procudure, they are usually very happy with the fairly impressive change achievable.

There is however a certain chance that both surgeon and patient agree on performing a touch-up procedure like a scar revision, often around the nipple, after about a year has passed.Whilst these are mainly minor procedures that can be done under local anesthetic, scientific literature reports incidence of such requests being as high as 15%.
Especially for UK residents coming to Spain for cosmetic surgery this has to be discussed and born in mind.
The most common misunderstanding within this procedure is the expected change of breast size.
“Uplift and implants combined do not necessarily increase cup size, but rather a preexisting cup-size is filled by proper breast volume than just by an empty skin envelope. It is about changing the shape of breast, not primarily about increasing the size. There must be a good understanding between patient and surgeon beforehand, I always say the patients with breast augmentation with uplift need to be selected very carefully.Especially patients rather wishing bigger breasts need to be advised that there is unfortunately no way to get around gravity in the long term.”
The change in breast shape is quite dramatic and patient satisfaction with the operation generally very high.
However, patient understanding regarding the procedure must be kept very clear.
Whilst scarring, implant positioning and staging were and will remain a controversial topic among Plastic surgeons for a while, the combination of breast implants with breast uplift can,on the other hand, be one of the most rewarding surgeries of all.

Dr.Alexander Amir  Aslani, MD, EBOPRAS

Hospital:
Director and Chief Surgeon
Department of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery
Hospital Quiron Malaga
Avda.Imperio Argentina, 1
E-29004 Malaga
Spain
www.quiron.es

Private practice:
Cirumed Clinic
Avda.Ramon y Cajal 7-4°
E-29601 Marbella/Malaga
Spain
Phone:+34 607 307 515
info@cirumed.es
www.cirumed.es

Which breast augmentation incision is best?

There is no one best incision, since it depends on factors like what kind of breast implants you are getting, your anatomy, your lifestyle, what size implants you are getting, and your surgeon’s preferences.

To some extent, it is up to the patient. In Spain, for instance, we observe many patients favouring  breast augmentation via a periareolar (nipple) incision, for a variety of reasons.

There is no single best incision, but lots of pros and cons.
There are surgeons who will insist that one is better than the other, and each type of incision has undoubtedly got advantages.
It all depends upon your needs. Remember, you will end up with bigger breasts no matter what incision is used, but some will give you less scarring than others. Always think long-term because implants may, one day, have to be replaced.

Read more about breast augmentation in Spain here.

Dr.Alexander Amir  Aslani, MD, EBOPRAS

Hospital:
Chief Surgeon and Head of Department
Department of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery
Hospital Quiron Malaga
Avda.Imperio Argentina, 1
E-29004 Malaga
Spain
www.quiron.es

Private practice:
Cirumed Clinic
Avda.Ramon y Cajal 7-4°
E-29601 Marbella/Malaga
Spain
Phone:+34 607 307 515
info@cirumed.es
www.cirumed.es

Trigger finger release

….is a common condition mostly affecting 3rd and 4th finger. The principle is that, for a variety of reasons, the flexor tendon of a finger may get trapped in a “pulley” that normally forms they basis for the flexor tendon to glide in.

Should now the tendon thicken or other pathologic processes restrict movement of the tendon within the pulley, this can lead to entrapment of the tendon within the pulley and blockage of movement. it is one of the most common requests in hand surgery.

Whilst steriod injections have been suggested and are possibly still widely practised, state of the art treatment is surgical release of the pulley, which can easily be done under local anestetic.

Read more about trigger finger here.

Dr.Alexander Amir Aslani, MD, EBOPRAS

Hospital:
Chief Surgeon and Head of Department
Department of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery
Hospital Quiron Malaga
Avda.Imperio Argentina, 1
E-29004 Malaga
Spain
www.quiron.es

Private practice:
Cirumed Clinic
Avda.Ramon y Cajal 7-4°
E-29601 Marbella/Malaga
Spain
Phone:+34 607 307 515
info@cirumed.es
www.cirumed.es