Breast augmentation

Dr.Aslani, Head of department of Plastic surgery of Hospital Quiron Malaga, presents case based discussions of breast enlargement cases

28 year old patient requesting breast enlargement,moderate amount of gland

After submuscular breast enlargement, round implants.

The patient requested cleavage, therefore round implants where the better option. The submuscular position gave the patient cleavage but still a antural look.

This patient requested breast augmentation but a natural look was of utmost importance to her, therefore the decision was made to use anatomical implants.

Another example of a moderate profile implant in submuscular position:

Again the round implants do not cause an overly wound shape in the submuscular position, but provide cleavage.

The moderate profile prevents too much of gap between implants

The inframmary incision is not noticable in the new inframammary fold.

The next patient requested the most natural look possible, cleavage was of less importance to her, the decision was made to use anatomical implants.

Before and after augmentation with 335 cc anatomical implants

Different patients request different options, and a solution which is desired by one patient may not be so good for another patient.

There is no precut recipe which applies to all patients, therefore we suggest to take sufficient time to discuss in depth all options between surgeon and patient.

We do mainly use implants of the Natrelle, Allergan and Polytech brands.

For more information visit our Homepage:

www.cirumed.es

Breast enlargement without implants ?

Dr.Alexander Aslani, Specialist Plastic Surgeon and Head of the Department of Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery of Hospital Quiron in Malaga, Spain, on of the  most controversial  topic in cosmetic surgery: breast enlargement without implants.

Macrolane

Is currently a very popular option with a few myths around it.

With view to the popularity of breast enlargement in Spain,I see significant numbers of patients looking for this possibility, with few of them actually being aware of the limitations in indications.

Basically Macrolane is hyaluronic acid, which is well known and a has a long history as a wrinkle filler , just used in a higher density. It is the most frequently used brand for the indication with new ones coming onto the market now.

The concept is to use this as a “filler” for the breast. The idea is very appealing and there are indeed some interesting indications for Macrolane in breast enlargement for selected patients.

Macrolane is also suitable to treat small contour deformities, especially after liposuction. I think this will be one of its prime and most widely used  indications in the future. Macrolane for breast enlaregment will play a role, of course, but patients seeking breast enlargement via this route will have to understand the limitations.

Macrolane injections have to be repeated, although required injection volumes for subsequent “touch-ups” are significantly less than for the first treatment. Macrolane can be administered using local anestetic, but macrolane injections have to take place in an operating theatre though, for the sake of patient safety.

Amongst surgeons, there is a certain range of opinion as to how much macrolane may be used in one session for breast augmentation. I prefer to restrict to about 100 cc per session. Some surgeons inject a lot more, but there are concerns whether distribuition of fluid is entirely predictable or not. To my opinion, with an injection of 100 cc one stays within a safe margin, preventing the danger of unforeseen and undesired fluid distribution.

Lumipness and adverse reactions have been observed in some cases. Patients need to be aware of this.

They problem is usually temporaray, but can last for some time.

Whilst  macrolane has already been available on the market for a couple of years, this is still a comparably short time from the surgical point of view.

Downside is furthermore  that the possible volume injection is restricted.

Case example macrolane before and after 180cc macrolane breast augmentation:

Macrolane is currently the most popular solution in non-surgical breast augmentation.

The augmentation shown does exhibit the, usually, maximum possible augmentat¡on in one session.

In this case, 80 cc macrolane were applied 20 months after the initial procedure.

This reflects the usual percentage of reabsorption.

Free microvascular tissue transfer

It is possible to apply tissue transfer techniques parallel to those used for breast cancer , also  for breast enlargement.

Therefore tissue can be taken from the buttocks or from the abdomen and transferred to the breast.

Microsurgical techniques are then used to anastomose vessels taken with the block of tissue, to donor vessels,usually in the axilla. This is an extensive operation.

This makes any  implant removals in the future superflous. However it is a very expensive and long operation and will therefore remain a rather exotic indication. It may be used in cases of congenital breast deformities though, like Poland-Syndrome (failure of breast bud to develop on one side). In these cases, microsurgical free tissue transfer may be considered.

The extent and cost of this operation will leave this possibility random in the future. Some surgeons say that the extent of such surgery is disproportionate to the effort of mere breast enlargement.

I do not necessarily agree to this, but suggest that patients are entitled to decide individually after careful explanation of the implications involved.

It is a consideration in discussing breast enlargement options.

Autologous fat transplantation

The one of the dreams of Plastic surgery.

Take the patient´s own (autologous) fat from somewhere else and inject it for breast enlargement.

Unfortunately it is not that easy.

There are certain established methods to prepare fat for transfer, especially the so-called Coleman technique (centrifugation technique) and numerous preparation kits are on the market.

Success of these techniques is quite variable though.

They may, or they may not, work. The smaller the volume of fat injected, the larger the chance of “take”. Take means the percantage of fat that survuves the transplantation. This take of fat transplants is vetry variable and differs from patient to patient.

Current research is aiming at mixing free autologous fat with growth factors and even to “breed”patients own fat cells.

This may increase survival of fat tissue but there are, as I have to say, fundamented concerns that these growth factors may possibly promote growth of breast cancer.

We are still in the pioneering stages of such “tissue-engeneering” techniques.

Vacuum-assisted devices

Have received excessive marketing attention. Principle of these treatments is that continued vaccum pressure applied to te breast may assist in breast enlargement of tissues.

I personally cannot comment on possible success, since I have no experience with these.

From the strictly scientific point of view the success rates seem rather fictional. I do not see any physiological mechanism suggesting that this really works.

For more information visit our Homepage:

www.cirumed.es

Which breast augmentation incision is best?

There is no one best incision, since it depends on factors like what kind of breast implants you are getting, your anatomy, your lifestyle, what size implants you are getting, and your surgeon’s preferences.

To some extent, it is up to the patient. In Spain, for instance, we observe many patients favouring  breast augmentation via a periareolar (nipple) incision, for a variety of reasons.

There is no single best incision, but lots of pros and cons.
There are surgeons who will insist that one is better than the other, and each type of incision has undoubtedly got advantages.
It all depends upon your needs. Remember, you will end up with bigger breasts no matter what incision is used, but some will give you less scarring than others. Always think long-term because implants may, one day, have to be replaced.

For more information visit our Homepage:

www.cirumed.es

Choosing implant size in breast augmentation

Choice of size is a difficult, but important factor in breast/breast enlargement surgery. 
To my experience, it can go two ways, but from a practitioners point of view it is much more frequent to see patients asking for bigger implants than having it the other way round.
I think a contributing factor is especially that many patients orientate on “celebrity”-examples of patients who have had more than one breast augmentation and in that case tend to look “over”operated indeed.
It is impossible to try a breast implant on like a shirt. You dont get this opportunity in breast augmentation. Several factors need to be considered.
1. Dissatisfaction with breast size is the number one cause for re-operation in breast augmentation surgery. Nevertheless, it is not a revision for a surgical complication because everything may have gone very well.
2. You cannot plan a cup size,a cup size is just a letter. It is more important to gather together photographs of your likes and dislikes when it comes to breast size, shape and form. Different brands of manufacturers will have different cup sizes for the same breast.
3. Sizing implants slipped into your bra can give you a relative estimate of breast implant volume.The tend to look a bit “stuck-on”. Most surgeons, who frequently perform this operation will have a set of sizing implants available for you to examine and place in a bra.
Go for the feeling in size and not for the look.
4.Remember that in breast augmentation there are factors that cannot be changed, like for instance the width of your sternum. Breast enlargement gives you a bigger breast and a certain
Change in shape. However, you cannot buy a breast “of the shelf”
5.The choice of projection and implant shape, be it teardrop or round, will depend on the shape of your breast before the operation and position on the implant. I frequently observe that patients translate a solution from a friend they might know and who has had a breast augmentation to themselves.This does not work this way. Every body is different and everybody is individual.

For more information visit our Homepage:

www.cirumed.es

Incision placement in breast enlargement

What is the perfect incision placement for breast augmentation ?

Well, there is none. There is different options, the most popular ones being

1.The armpit. This is a very elegant approach, implying the the breast implant is brought in through an incision in the armpit. I personally have used it for quite a while and on very special patient request I still do, but a few points have to be taken into account. Firstly, the skin of the armpit can impossibly be made sterile, so there is a higher risk of infection, secondly, I have had patients who, after axilar breast enlargement, reported certain restrictions in movement to me. This has to be taken into account.

2.The nipple. In planning breast enlargement, I guess half of the patient is very keen to have their incision through the nipple and half are terrified just by the thought of that. there are really very different views on that. Since I personally only use cohesive gel implants, a certain size of the nipple is necessar. This does not have to be excessive but should be sufficient to accommodate a 3cm cut along the lower nipple border.The scar will fade with any of the three incisions mentioned, but probably quickest here.

3.The inframammary crease. Great advantage of this incision in breast enlargement is that it heralds the smallest risk of infection, and the inframammary fold can be planned very accurately.Length of incision is normally around 3-4 cm.

Case example from our practice:

Patient with very little breast tissue and small nipple

Athletic, desire for substantial augmentation

Patient requested cohesive gel implants

Therefore nipple no suitable option

Post op result

Inframmary, submuscular augmentation

300cc moderate profile round coheisve gel implants

6 months post op inframmary incision not visible

Preoperative A cup, postoperative C-cup

There are some exotic variations like endoscopic approaches through the  bellybutton just to name one example, who I feel make restricted sense from the physiological point of view since when placing a foreign body large dissection pathes make the procedure somewhat more risky.

In Spain, breast augmentation remains the most popular aesthetic surgical procedure.

For more information visit our Homepage:

www.cirumed.es